


There are a number of advantages in doing so.
Contrary to the popular misconception, owning a Freehold does not nullify the Leases, as they are still required to regulate the responsibilities of the flats owner in conjunction with those of the neighbouring flats. However, owning the freehold affords these leasehold owners with the power to amend their leases and such leaseholders will typically seek to grant themselves lease extensions for a 999 year term.
Often buying the freehold will have secondary benefits such as the acquisition of managerial control over the running of the building. However, achieving that is wholly dependent on whether the legal entitlements currently rest with the Landlord or a Manager under the terms of the lease. In other words, purchasing the freehold will not take over management where there is a third party management company already prescribed within the leases themselves (in such a case, the Right to Manage is the appropriate action to acquire management)
If the leaseholders within the building wish to purchase, then it may be possible, providing at least 50% of them form a group to legally claim this together. This is known as Leasehold Enfranchisement, or more specifically "collective enfranchisement" which pertains to flats rather than houses. It is a means by which those leaseholders can compel the sale of the Freehold of a block of flats to them on terms that are prescribed within the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993
If on the other hand, the Freehold owner has voluntarily seeks to sell the Freehold, then a different process manifests, which is known as the "Right of First Refusal", which is governed by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. This law is intended to prevent the Landlord for selling until he has first given a pre-emption right to the leaseholders in the building to buy the building first. In other words, the Landlord must offer the sale of the building to all the leaseholders first, using a notice known as a "Section 5" Notice, and he effectively breaks the law if he does not do so and goes ahead and transfers the Freehold regardless.
When a leaseholder first becomes a Freeholder, they are entitled to modify those leases which they own as leaseholders, most significantly by extending them without the need to pay a Premium (purchase price).
As such, it is only sensible to commence a legal "claim" and pay to buy one or the other to achieve those same ends, but not both.
There is a relationship between the price of the Freehold and the Lease Extension prices within a Freehold block.
To best understand these concepts it is best to first consider what a lease actually is? It is a contract between a Landlord and Tenant, granting that Tenant temporary ownership rights over a property. Surprisingly, it is not fundamentally dissimilar from the short tenancy agreements that you may be accustomed to for short terms accommodation (tenancy agreements). The main difference between it and long leasehold being that instead of short lettings usually being for a terms of 6 or 12 months, a long leasehold is typically originally granted for 99 years or 125 years.
But you may wonder, 'what happens when those years expire to 0?' Well, the concept is that the owner of the Freehold reclaims ownership of that particular leased property. One would expect that If he were to do so, he would then be able to create a brand new lease for that property on the open market and thereby sell the flat for its full value to a new leaseholder for the full market price.
Due to the lease length effectively providing for how soon the Landlord will obtain that full market price of the flat, you can begin to understand that the shorter a lease becomes the greater the financial impact to the Landlord if the lease was to be renewed and thereby preventing that Landlord from reclaiming his asset.
This is therefore a crucial factor into the equation for lease extension prices under the statutory regime as well as freehold values. So a lease that, say, has only a year left, will cost virtually the entire price of a flat's market value - whereas the cost of an extension when the lease is still long will cost relatively little in comparison. We call this unexpired term of the lease "reversion".
Whether the reversion is low or high will be the most significant factor impact ing how much a lease extension will cost.
Simply put, when purchasing a Freehold asset that contains leasehold flats, the buyer is effectively preventing the Landlord from claiming all the lease extension money he would derive under all the leases in the block. While there are other mathematical factors which need to be accounted for in the equation (such as development value), essentially the leaseholders are paying the Landlord all of this lease extension money for all the flats in the building in order to buy the Building.
As such, just as the longer leaseholders wait to buy lease extensions, the more the extension will cost - the same is true in the case of buying the Freehold using this method of Collective Enfranchisement. The longer one waits to buy the Freehold, the shorter the leases will become thus inflating the Freehold price.
In the case of a voluntary sale on the other hand (under the aforementioned 'Right of First Refusal'), this is a little different. While it is likely that any prudent Landlord will use a similar method of calculation to set the price offered, he is not bound to use any particular formula for the offered price of the Freehold.
The Landlord could pluck figures 'from the sky' as it were. Within the context of a voluntary sale, the Landlord is effectively only limited by the fact that he commits an offense if he proceeds to sell at a particular price without having first offered that price to the leaseholders first.
Privacy Policy